ScrapBull
Marketplace/Specialty Scrap/Ballasts (Fluorescent)
Ballasts (Fluorescent)
Specialty Scrap

Ballasts (Fluorescent)

Grade: VariousLow Tier

Lighting ballasts - PCB and non-PCB types

Market Price EstimateUpdated Daily
$350/ MT
-15 (-4.1%)vs yesterday
Verified specifications & market data

Chemical Composition

Elemental breakdown by percentage weight.

Standard composition limits
Values represent maximum allowed percentage unless otherwise noted.

Physical Properties

Material form, density, and contamination specifications.

End-of-life fluorescent lighting ballasts; lighting equipment decommissioning; LOW precious metal content (8-18% copper; 50-70% steel); EXTREME hazmat complexity (PCB contamination legacy ballasts CRITICAL; EPA testing mandatory pre-1978; transformation oil hazmat variable; capacitor hazard potential); MAXIMUM supplier diversity (389 suppliers; lighting ubiquity extreme); LOW-MEDIUM value commodity; copper recovery modest; steel secondary; PCB/oil hazmat dominant concern; hazardous waste specialist processing required; environmental/occupational hazmat stringent; declining secular trend (LED lighting replacement dominant)

Acceptable Inclusions
  • Copper 8-18% (ballast specification)
  • Steel 50-70% (commodity value)
  • Mineral oil 2-8% (modern safe)
  • Plastic 8-15% (recyclable)
  • Post-1978 ballasts (non-PCB; modern safe)
Prohibited Materials
  • PCB-contaminated ballasts (pre-1978; HAZMAT EXTREME; EPA violation)
  • Unknown age/vintage (PCB risk unquantified; testing mandatory)
  • Mixed PCB/non-PCB batches (contamination risk; separation required)
  • Intact ballasts without hazmat assessment (processing hazard)

Quality Assurance

Testing protocols, sampling methods, and acceptance criteria.

Sampling Protocol
frequencyStratified sampling by ballast age/vintage; testing pre-1978; oil hazmat assessment; contamination risk comprehensive
maximumQuantity1000+ ballasts per shipment
minimumQuantity50-200 ballasts or 20-100 kg
percentage15-25% of lot
stratificationSample across ballast ages; manufacturers; types; hazmat assessment
Acceptance Limits
age AssessmentBallast vintage/age estimated; pre-1978 status
all Criteria Must PassMaterial be fluorescent ballast; status verified; hazmat profile established; compliance confirmed
ballast AuthenticityConfirmed as fluorescent ballast
copper ContentCopper 8-18% confirmed
hazmat Protocolhazmat disposal protocol established; regulatory compliance confirmed; waste code assigned if applicable
oil TypeOil type identified; environmental hazmat profile established
pcb Statusstatus verified; <0.001% hazmat classification assigned
steel ContentSteel 50-70% confirmed
Weight Tolerance
measurementVerified by certified scale; weight accountability for hazmat waste commodity
variance±10% from expected weight

Required Test Methods

Visual Ballast Age Assessment

CRITICAL
Method 1
Purpose
  • determine ballast manufacture date
  • establish PCB risk profile (pre-1978 = extreme)
Acceptance Criteria
  • Ballast age estimated
  • PCB risk category established
  • pre-1978 identification CONFIRMED if applicable
Procedure
  • 100% visual inspection
  • identify ballast markings/manufacturer
  • research production date if possible
  • estimate manufacture decade
  • classify pre-1978 status ()

PCB Testing via Gas Chromatography

MANDATORY
Method 2
Purpose
  • detect
  • verify EPA environmental regulations
  • quantify hazmat disposal cost impact
Acceptance Criteria
  • PCB testing completed ( pre-1978)
  • PCB <0.001% VERIFIED (compliant) OR PCB DETECTED (hazmat classification assigned
  • disposal requirement established)

Oil Hazmat Type Assessment

CRITICAL
Method 3
Purpose
  • identify oil type (PCB legacy vs. mineral modern)
  • establish environmental hazmat profile
  • determine disposal pathway
Acceptance Criteria
  • Oil type confirmed (mineral oil modern safe OR PCB-contaminated legacy extreme)
  • hazmat profile established
  • disposal protocol clear

Copper & Steel Content Verification

Method 4
Purpose
  • Verify copper 8-18%
  • confirm steel 50-70%
  • establish commodity metal value base
Acceptance Criteria
  • Cu 8-18%, Fe 50-70%
  • specification met
  • commodity basis confirmed
Procedure
  • Visual metal assessment
  • copper winding identification
  • steel lamination
  • metal percentage estimation

EPA Hazardous Waste Classification

CRITICAL
Method 5
Purpose
  • Regulatory : determine EPA waste classification
  • assign hazardous waste code if PCB-positive
  • establish disposal requirements
Acceptance Criteria
  • EPA classification assigned
  • waste category documented
  • disposal pathway specified
  • regulatory compliance verified
Cookie Notice

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience.